﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Samsung P2 MP3 Player &#8211; Apple iPod Alternative?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gadget-blog.co.uk/apple-ipods-mp3-players/samsung-p2-mp3-player/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gadget-blog.co.uk/apple-ipods-mp3-players/samsung-p2-mp3-player/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 22:57:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gareth</title>
		<link>http://www.gadget-blog.co.uk/apple-ipods-mp3-players/samsung-p2-mp3-player/#comment-1781</link>
		<dc:creator>Gareth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 18:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gadget-blog.co.uk/2007/10/15/samsung-p2-mp3-player/#comment-1781</guid>
		<description>This looks okay but to compete with the iPhone other MP3 manufacturers really need to add value to what people are paying for. It has to do something completely new, however the design is quite sleek and I&#039;ve seen much worse!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This looks okay but to compete with the iPhone other MP3 manufacturers really need to add value to what people are paying for. It has to do something completely new, however the design is quite sleek and I&#8217;ve seen much worse!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
